One Authority, One Design & One Way To Work

I really like the Motorola's latest Xoom teaser Ad and packs a good punch! This is the tablet I am looking to buy next month. It's time to live a free life :-)

Apple Turns Uncool in 2011

Full Story: Hedge Funds Crash, Apple Turns Uncool in 2011

"The Apple Inc. backlash starts. We used to think International Business Machines Corp. was sort of sinister. Then it was Microsoft Corp. But which business today has far too much power, is run by control freaks and puts profits before principles? That’s right. The world’s third-biggest company, measured by market value, is about to discover that the line between cool upstart and ugly monopolist is a very thin one."

If you have been following my blog, I predicted that 2010 would be the best year for Apple. I guess I am not alone in that prediction :-)

WikiLeaks App Removal - Another example of Apple Dictatorship

Full story: Apple Removes WikiLeaks Program From App Store

An Apple spokeswoman said the program was removed because it violated company rules that state apps must “comply with all local laws and may not put an individual or group in harm’s way.” She didn’t respond to a question about why the app had originally been approved.

As of today, Wikileaks has not been convicted of any crime or even charged with anything. If so, why would Apple decide to pull the app with a vague explanation? What local laws were actually broken? Also, where is the proof that the app put any individual at risk? The app in question simply put a nice UI around what is publically available? Should Apple's Safari Browser be banned as well as it provides access?

Why Does Apple Make Donation Apps So Hard?

Solution: Give Apple a 30% CUT in donations and there might be a chance to keep the feature.

Full story here

Why Does Apple Offer Free Engraving?

Original Story here

While it is all speculation, given Apple's history and its ability to want to control everything including how you use their product (not to mention sucking every penny out of you), I would bet that it is not in the best interest of their consumers. The original article and ensuing comments points out couple of reasons

• The real reason Apple offers free engraving is to weaken the secondary market....By offering free engraving, Apple makes these used devices less valuable to other consumers. Who wants a weird engraving chosen by the previous owner on his iP*d? The more iP*ds are engraved, the smaller (or at least less valuable) the secondary market is, and the more profitable it is to be the durable-goods monopolist, Apple.
• Engraved products are not returnable
• It causes people to buy the products thru the Apple store, which is more economical for Apple than when people buy products thru third party retailers. It is that simple. Apple gets the retail price of the product when it sells rather than the wholesale price

I made my prediction/bet during last christmas (2009) that 2010 would be the best year for Apple and I still stand by it. 2011 would be the beginning of end of Apple's meteoric rise. Don't expect the stock to drop on January 1st 2011. It would be a gradual drop. Andriod surpassing iPhone (which is their biggest money maker) in terms of daily activations is one proof and its dominance of iPad will be challenged by many products that will be out between now and 1st quarter of 2011.

Perhaps I should do a put option on Apple stock and be rich instead of bitching!

Apple bars Danish Android magazine from App Store

Full Story Here

Excerpts

"Apple has rejected a "magazine" app from Danish publisher Mediaprovider because the content was exclusively about Android, the rival mobile OS to Apple's own iOS -- reinforcing charges that Apple's censorship is heavy-handed, arbitrary and in some cases hypocritical .."

We would never know what the real reason was as Apple is not known for being transparent. Assuming that the app rejection is primarily because it features competitor's mobile OS, well this is yet another proof that re-inforces what everyone is saying. Apple isn't good for the Web. Apple isn't good for Technology progress. Apple isn't good for your Wallet.

Apple is number one danger to Internet freedom

Orginal Article: Apple is number one danger to Internet freedom, says Columbia professor

Excerpts

The man who coined the term "net neutrality" now says that Apple is the company that most endangers the freedom of the Internet. Columbia law professor Tim Wu also tells the New York Times that he expects that danger to outlive Steve Jobs' tenure at Apple.


Which companies do you fear the most?


Right now, I’d have to say Apple.
...

What worries you about Apple?
As I discuss in the book, Steve Jobs has the charisma, vision and instincts of every great information emperor. The man who helped create the personal computer 40 years ago is probably the leading candidate to help exterminate it. His vision has an undeniable appeal, but he wants too much control.